Papers reviewed at full text#Full.Reference#Year data collection was started#Sample size#Valuation method#Effect size metric#Payment vehicle#Country#Forest type#Cultural ecosystem service classes
Adams et al., 2008#Adams, C., da Motta, R. S., Ortiz, R. A., Reid, J., Aznar, C. E., & de Almeida Sinisgalli, P. A. (2008). The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil). Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), 359-370.#2002#648#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Brazil#Tropical forest#Existence
Alcon et al., 2019#Alcon, F., Albaladejo-Garcia, J. A., Zabala, J. A., Marin-Minano, C., & Martinez-Paz, J. M. (2019). Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain. Journal for Nature Conservation, 51, 125722.#2015#384#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Forest Plantation#Existence, Recreation, Education
Armatas et al., 2018#Armatas, C. A., Campbell, R. M., Watson, A. E., Borrie, W. T., Christensen, N., & Venn, T. J. (2018). An integrated approach to valuation and tradeoff analysis of ecosystem services for national forest decision-making. Ecosystem services, 33, 1-18.#2016#310#CE#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Forest#Recreation
Avenzora et al., 2016#Avenzora, R., Sunarminto, T., Pratiekto, P. E., & Lee, J. H. (2016). PRICING STRATEGY FOR QUASI-PUBLIC FOREST TOURISM PARK Case Study in Gunung Pancar Forest Tourism Park, Bogor Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 3(2), 65-82.#2014#130#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#Indonesia#Forest#Recreation
Bakhtiari et al., 2014#Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J. B., & Jensen, F. S. (2014). Willingness to travel to avoid recreation conflicts in Danish forests. Urban forestry & urban greening, 13(4), 662-671.#2012#1200#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Denmark#Forest#Recreation
Bateman et al., 1995#Bateman, I., & Langford, I. H. (1995). Design effects in contingent valuation studies: mental account and temporal ordering effects. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment.#1993#351#CV#mean WTP#Tax#UK#Forest#Recreation
Bateman et al., 1996#Bateman, I. J. (1996). Household willingness to pay and farmers' willingness to accept compensation for establishing a recreational woodland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39(1), 21-44.#1991#325#CV#mean WTP#Trip#UK#Forest#Recreation
Bateman et al., 1997#Bateman, I. J., & Langford, I. H. (1997). Budget-constraint, temporal, and question-ordering effects in contingent valuation studies. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1215-1228.#1993#255#CV#mean WTP#Tax#UK#Forest#Recreation
Bateman et al., 1999#"Bateman, I. J., Brainard, J. S., Lovett, A. A., & Garrod, G. D. (1999). The impact of measurement assumptions upon individual travel cost estimates of consumer surplus: a GIS analysis. Regional Environmental Change, 1(1), 24-30.
Chicago	"#1993#351#TC#CS#Trip#UK#Forest#Recreation
Becker et al., 2009#Becker, N., & Freeman, S. (2009). The economic value of old growth trees in Israel. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(8), 608-615.#2006#322#CV#mean WTP#One-off#Israel#Primary forest#Existence, Bequest
Belcher et al., 2018#Belcher, R. N., & Chisholm, R. A. (2018). Tropical vegetation and residential property value: A hedonic pricing analysis in Singapore. Ecological Economics, 149, 149-159.#2014#15962#HP#Price#House#Singapore#Urban forest#Recreation, Aesthetic
Bennett et al., 1995#Bennett, R., Tranter, R., Beard, N., & Jones, P. (1995). The value of footpath provision in the countryside: a case-study of public access to urban-fringe woodland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(3), 409-418.#1993#200#CV#mean WTP#Trip#UK#Forest#Recreation
Bernabéu et al., 2014#Bernabéu, R., & Samos, A. (2014). Determinants of public forest management decisions: The Calares Delmundo and Sima natural park (SPAIN). International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(4), 1341-1348.#2009#410#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Spain#Mixed forest#Recreation
Bernath et al., 2008#Bernath, K., & Roschewitz, A. (2008). Recreational benefits of urban forests: Explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(3), 155-166.#2004#1472#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Switzerland#Urban forest#Recreation
Bestard et al., 2010#Bestard, A. B., & Font, A. R. (2010). Estimating the aggregate value of forest recreation in a regional context. Journal of Forest Economics, 16(3), 205-216.#2006#1043#TC#CS#Trip#Spain#Forest#Recreation
Bishop et al., 1992#Bishop, K. (1992). Assessing the benefits of community forests: an evaluation of the recreational use benefits of two urban fringe woodlands. Journal of environmental planning and management, 35(1), 63-76.#1990#200#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Forest#Recreation
Brahic et al., 2015#Brahic, E., & Rambonilaza, T. (2015). The impact of information on public preferences for forest biodiversity preservation: a split-sample test with choice experiment method. Revue d'économie politique, 125(2), 253-275.#2012#1532#CE#mean WTP#Tax#France#Forest#Recreation
Brey et al., 2007#Brey, R., Riera, P., & Mogas, J. (2007). Estimation of forest values using choice modeling: an application to Spanish forests. Ecological Economics, 64(2), 305-312.#2006#730#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Mixed forest#Recreation
Broch et al., 2013#Broch, S. W., Strange, N., Jacobsen, J. B., & Wilson, K. A. (2013). Farmers' willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. Ecological Economics, 92, 78-86.#2009#1027#CE#marginal rate of substitution#One-off#Denmark#Forest#Recreation
Caboun et al., 2014#Caboun, V., Kovalcik, M., & Sarvasova, Z. (2014). Concept of the integrative aspects of the forest ecosystem services with case study on recreation services assessment in Slovakia. Ecological Processes, 3(1), 1-6.#2007#1732#TC#CS#Trip#Slovakia#Forest#Recreation
Campbell et al., 2014#Campbell, D., Vedel, S. E., Thorsen, B. J., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2014). Heterogeneity in the WTP for recreational access: distributional aspects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(8), 1200-1219.#2011#811#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Denmark#Forest#Recreation
Campos et al., 2007#Campos, P., Caparros, A., & Oviedo, J. L. (2007). Comparing payment-vehicle effects in contingent valuation studies for recreational use in two protected Spanish forests. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 60-85.#1998#1759#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Spain#Coniferous forest#Recreation
Caparrós et al., 2017#Caparrós, A., Oviedo, J. L., Álvarez, A., & Campos, P. (2017). Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: Theory and application to free access recreation. Ecological Economics, 139, 140-149.#2010#4050#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Spain#Forest#Recreation
Carson et al., 2015#Carson, R. T., DeShazo, J. R., Schwabe, K. A., Vincent, J. R., & Ahmad, I. (2015). Incorporating local visitor valuation information into the design of new recreation sites in tropical forests. Ecological Economics, 120, 338-349.#2010#1261#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#Malaysia#Tropical forest#Recreation
Castillo-Eguskitza et al., 2019#Castillo-Eguskitza, N., Hoyos, D., Onaindia, M., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). Unraveling local preferences and willingness to pay for different management scenarios: A choice experiment to biosphere reserve management. Land use policy, 88, 104200.#2016#266#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Forest#Aesthetic, Cultural heritage, Recreation
Cetin et al., 2021#Cetin, N.iI, Bourget, G. & Tezer, A. (2021). Travel-cost method for assessing the monetary value of recreational services in the Ömerli Catchment. Ecological Economics, 190, 107192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107192#2018#568#TC#CS#Trip#Turkey#Urban forest#Recreation
Chapagain et al., 2018#Chapagain, B. P., Poudyal, N. C., Bowker, J. M., Askew, A. E., English, D. B., & Hodges, D. G. (2018). Potential effects of climate on downhill skiing and snowboarding demand and value at US. The Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 36(2), 75-96.#2005#16095#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Chen et al., 2012#Chen, W. J., & Liaw, S. C. (2012). What is the value of eco-tourism? An evaluation of forested trails for community residents and visitors. Tourism Economics, 18(4), 871-885.#2006#1372#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Taiwan#Forest#Recreation
Chen et al., 2017#Chen, B., Nakama, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Traditional village forest landscapes: Tourists' attitudes and preferences for conservation. Tourism Management, 59, 652-662.#2014#266#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Japan#Urban forest#Recreation
Christie et al., 2007#Christie, M., Hanley, N., & Hynes, S. (2007). Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods. Journal of Forest Economics, 13(2-3), 75-102.#2005#1568#CV#mean WTP#Trip#UK#Forest#Recreation
Crespo-Cebada et al., 2020#Crespo-Cebada, E., Díaz-Caro, C., Robina-Ramírez, R., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2020). Is Biodiversity a Relevant Attribute for Assessing Natural Parks? Evidence from Cornalvo Natural Park in Spain. Forests, 11(4), 410.#2019#373#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#Spain#Forest#Recreation
Crocker et al., 1985#Crocker, T. D. (1985). On the value of the condition of a forest stock. Land Economics, 61(3), 244-254.#1983#100#CV#mean WTP#Trip#USA#Coniferous forest#Recreation
Czajkowski et al., 2009#Czajkowski, M., Buszko-Briggs, M., & Hanley, N. (2009). Valuing changes in forest biodiversity. Ecological Economics, 68(12), 2910-2917.#2007#400#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Poland#Forest#Existence, Bequest
Czajkowski et al., 2014#Czajkowski, M., Bartczak, A., Giergiczny, M., Navrud, S., & Żylicz, T. (2014). Providing preference-based support for forest ecosystem service management. Forest Policy and Economics, 39, 1-12.#2010#1001#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Poland#Forest#Recreation
Daly-Hassen et al., 2017#Daly-Hassen, H., Riera, P., Mavsar, R., Gammoudi, A., & Garcia, D. (2017). Valuing trade-offs between local forest uses and environmental services in Tunisia. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(3), 268-282.#2008#447#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Tunisia#Forest#Recreation
De Valck et al., 2014#De Valck, J., Vlaeminck, P., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., Aertsens, J., Chen, W., & Vranken, L. (2014). Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 65-75.#2011#217#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Belgium#Mixed forest#Recreation
DeShazo et al., 2015#DeShazo, J. R., Carson, R. T., Schwabe, K. A., Vincent, J. R., Ismariah, A., Chong, S. K., & Chang, Y. T. (2015). Designing and implementing surveys to value tropical forests. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 92-114.#2010#1261#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Malaysia#Forest#Recreation
Downing et al., 1989#Downing, M., & Roberts, R. K. (1989). Consumer‐use valuation of the university of Tennessee arboretum. Leisure Sciences, 11(2), 111-121.#1987#202#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Urban forest#Recreation
Englin et al., 1991#Englin, J., & Mendelsohn, R. (1991). A hedonic travel cost analysis for valuation of multiple components of site quality: the recreation value of forest management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21(3), 275-290.#1982#447#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Englin et al., 2001#Englin, J., Loomis, J., & González-Cabán, A. (2001). The dynamic path of recreational values following a forest fire: a comparative analysis of states in the Intermountain West. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31(10), 1837-1844.#1998#674#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Ezebilo et al., 2015#Ezebilo, E. E., Boman, M., Mattsson, L., Lindhagen, A., & Mbongo, W. (2015). Preferences and willingness to pay for close to home nature for outdoor recreation in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(2), 283-296.#2007#594#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Sweden#Forest#Recreation
Fagarazzi et al., 2021#Fagarazzi, C.; Sergiacomi, C.; Stefanini, F.M.; Marone, E. (2021). A Model for the Economic Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services: The Recreational Hunting Function in the Agroforestry Territories of Tuscany (Italy). Sustainability, 13, 11229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011229#2019#216#TC#CS#Trip#Italy#Agroforest#Recreation
Fanariotu et al., 2004#Fanariotu, I., & Skuras, D. (2004). The contribution of scenic beauty indicators in estimating environmental welfare measures: a case study. Social Indicators Research, 65(2), 145-165.#1997#186#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Greece#Forest#Aesthetic
Fedrigotti et al., 2020#Fedrigotti, V. B., Troiano, S., Fischer, C., & Marangon, F. (2020). Public Preferences for Farmed Landscapes: the Case of Traditional Chestnut Orchards in South Tyrol. European Countryside, 12(1), 99-118.#2013#487#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#Italy#Forest Plantation#Recreation, Aesthetic, Cultural heritage, Recreation, Cultural heritage
Filyushkina et al., 2017#Filyushkina, A., Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Strange, N., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2017). Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?. Ecological Economics, 140, 22-29.#2015#1226#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Denmark#Mixed forest#Recreation
Francis et al., 2019#Francis, F. J., Hassan, A., Afandi, S. H. M., & Radam, A. (2019). Incorporating visitors’ preferences into the policy framework of a Rainforest Discovery Centre. Tourism Review.#2018#320#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Malaysia#Tropical forest#Recreation, Recreation, Education
Garcia et al., 2009#Garcia, S., Harou, P., Montagné, C., & Stenger, A. (2009). Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity. Journal of Forest Economics, 15(1-2), 59-78.#2002#1070#CV#mean WTP#One-off#France#Forest#Recreation
Garcia et al., 2011#Garcia, S., Harou, P., Montagné, C., & Stenger, A. (2011). Valuing forest biodiversity through a national survey in France: a dichotomous choice contingent valuation. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(2), 84-97.#2001#1850#CV#mean WTP#Tax#France#Forest#Recreation
Getzner et al., 2020#Getzner, M., & Meyerhoff, J. (2020). The Benefits of Local Forest Recreation in Austria and Its Dependence on Naturalness and Quietude. Forests, 11(3), 326.#2015#1501#TC#CS#Trip#Austria#Forest#Recreation
Greiner et al., 2004#Greiner, R., & Rolfe, J. (2004). Estimating consumer surplus and elasticity of demand of tourist visitation to a region in North Queensland using contingent valuation. Tourism Economics, 10(3), 317-328.#1999#1053#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#Australia#Forest#Recreation
Halstead et al., 1991#Halstead, J. M., Lindsay, B. E., & Brown, C. M. (1991). Use of the Tobit model in contingent valuation: experimental evidence from the Pemigewasset Wilderness Area. Journal of Environmental Management, 33(1), 79-89.#1989#230#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#USA#Forest#Recreation
Ham et al., 2012#Ham, C., Champ, P. A., Loomis, J. B., & Reich, R. M. (2012). Accounting for heterogeneity of public lands in hedonic property models. Land Economics, 88(3), 444-456.#2005#1536#HP#Price#House#USA#Forest#Recreation
Hanley et al., 1989#Hanley, N. D. (1989). Valuing rural recreation benefits: an empirical comparison of two approaches. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(3), 361-374.#1987#1148#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Mixed forest#Recreation
Hanley et al., 1993#Hanley, N. D., & Ruffell, R. J. (1993). The contingent valuation of forest characteristics: two experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 44(2), 218-229.#1991#859#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Mixed forest#Recreation
Hanley et al., 2009#Hanley, N., Colombo, S., Kriström, B., & Watson, F. (2009). Accounting for negative, zero and positive willingness to pay for landscape change in a national park. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1), 1-16.#2005#1006#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Forest#Recreation
Hesseln et al., 2004a#Hesseln, H., Loomis, J. B., & González-Cabán, A. (2004). The effects of fire on recreation demand in Montana. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 19(1), 47-53.#2000#559#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Hesseln et al., 2004b#Hesseln, H., Loomis, J. B., & González-Cabán, A. (2004). Comparing the economic effects of fire on hiking demand in Montana and Colorado. Journal of Forest Economics, 10(1), 21-35.#1998#559#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Hjerpe et al., 2016a#Hjerpe, E. E., & Hussain, A. (2016). Willingness to pay for ecosystem conservation in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest: a choice modeling study. Ecology and Society, 21(2).#2012#384#CE#mean WTP#One-off#USA#Primary forest#Existence
Hjerpe et al., 2016b#Hjerpe, E., Kim, Y. S., & Dunn, L. (2016). Forest density preferences of homebuyers in the wildland-urban interface. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 56-66.#2011#418#HP#Price#House#USA#Coniferous forest#Aesthetic
Hoen et al., 1993#Hoen, H. F., & Winther, G. (1993). Multiple use forestry and preservation of coniferous forests in Norway: a study of attitudes and willingness to pay. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8(1-4), 266-280.#1990#886#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Norway#Mixed forest#Recreation
Hunt et al., 2005#Hunt, L. M., Boxall, P., Englin, J., & Haider, W. (2005). Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis. Ecological Economics, 53(1), 101-113.#2000#1168#HP#Price#Missing#Canada#Forest#Recreation
Hutchinson et al., 2001#Hutchinson, W. G., Scarpa, R., Chilton, S. M., & McCallion, T. (2001). Parametric and Non‐Parametric Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Forest Recreation in Northern Ireland: A Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Study with Follow‐Ups. Journal of agricultural economics, 52(1), 104-122.#1992#5000#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Forest#Recreation
Iranah et al., 2018#Iranah, P., Lal, P., Wolde, B. T., & Burli, P. (2018). Valuing visitor access to forested areas and exploring willingness to pay for forest conservation and restoration finance: The case of small island developing state of Mauritius. Journal of environmental management, 223, 868-877.#2015#215#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#Mauritius#Forest#Recreation
Iversen et al., 2019#Iversen, E. K., Lindhjem, H., Jacobsen, J. B., & Grimsrud, K. (2019). Moving (back) to greener pastures? Social benefits and costs of climate forest planting in Norway. Land Use Policy, 104390.#2018#977#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Norway#Forest#Aesthetic
Jabarin et al., 2006#Jabarin, A. S., & Damhoureyeh, S. A. (2006). Estimating the recreational benefits of Dibeen National Park in Jordan using contingent valuation and travel cost methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9(12), 2198-2206.#2002#283#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Jordan#Forest#Recreation
Jang-Hwan et al., 2020#Jang-Hwan, J., So-Hee, P., JaChoon, K., Taewoo, R., Lim, E. M., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2020). Preferences for ecosystem services provided by urban forests in South Korea. Forest Science and Technology, 16(2), 86-103.#2015#500#CE#mean WTP#Tax#South Korea#Urban forest#Recreation
Jensen et al., 2019#Jensen, A. K., Uggeldahl, K. C., Jacobsen, B. H., Jensen, J. D., & Hasler, B. (2019). Including aesthetic and recreational values in cost-effectiveness analyses of land use change based nitrogen abatement measures in Denmark. Journal of environmental management, 240, 384-393.#2015#1893#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Denmark#Forest#Recreation
Juutinen et al., 2014#Juutinen, A., Kosenius, A. K., & Ovaskainen, V. (2014). Estimating the benefits of recreation-oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment. Journal of Forest Economics, 20(4), 396-412.#2012#1241#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Finland#Forest Plantation#Recreation
Juutinen et al., 2022#Juutinen, A., Immerzeel, B., Pouta, E., Lankia, T., Artell, J., Tolvanen, A., Ahtiainen, H. and Vermaat, J. (2022). A comparative analysis of the value of recreation in six contrasting Nordic landscapes using the travel cost method. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 39, p.100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100528#2018#979#TC#CS#Trip#Norway#Mixed forest#Recreation
Kaffashi et al., 2015#Kaffashi, S., Radam, A., Shamsudin, M. N., Yacob, M. R., & Nordin, N. H. (2015). Ecological conservation, ecotourism, and sustainable management: The case of Penang National Park. Forests, 6(7), 2345-2370.#2012#288#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Malaysia#Forest#Recreation
Kang et al., 2019#Kang, N., Wang, E., & Yu, Y. (2019). Valuing forest park attributes by giving consideration to the tourist satisfaction. Tourism economics, 25(5), 711-733.#2017#328#CE#mean WTP#Trip#China#Coniferous forest#Recreation
Keske et al., 2014#Keske, C. M., & Mayer, A. (2014). Visitor willingness to pay US forest service recreation fees in new west rural mountain economies. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(1), 87-100.#2009#120#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#USA#Forest#Recreation
Kiami et al., 2016#Kiami, F., Allahyari, M. S., & Kavoosi-Kalashami, M. (2016). An investigation on the recreational value of Masouleh Village, Iran. Tourism Planning & Development, 13(1), 111-119.#2013#150#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Iran#Forest#Recreation
Koo et al., 2013#Koo, J. C., Park, M. S., & Youn, Y. C. (2013). Preferences of urban dwellers on urban forest recreational services in South Korea. Urban forestry & urban greening, 12(2), 200-210.#2010#773#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#South Korea#Urban forest#Recreation
Lamhamedi et al., 2021#Lamhamedi, H., Lizin, S., Witters, N., Malina, R. and Baguare, A. (2021). The recreational value of a peri-urban forest in Morocco. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 65, p.127339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127339#2018#307#TC#CS#Trip#Morocco#Urban forest#Recreation
Lankia et al., 2014#Lankia, T., Neuvonen, M., Pouta, E., & Sievänen, T. (2014). Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland. Journal of forest economics, 20(2), 141-160.#2010#2761#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Finland#Forest#Recreation
Latinopoulos et al., 2019#Latinopoulos, D. (2019). The Role of Ecotourism in the Prespa National Park in Greece. Evidence from a Travel Cost Method and Hoteliers’ Perceptions. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism (JEMT), 10(08 (40)), 1731-1741.#2018#112#TC#CS#Trip#Greece#Forest#Recreation
Lehtoranta et al., 2017#Lehtoranta, V., Sarvilinna, A., Väisänen, S., Aroviita, J., & Muotka, T. (2017). Public values and preference certainty for stream restoration in forested watersheds in Finland. Water resources and economics, 17, 56-66.#2014#667#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Finland#Riparian forest#Recreation
Liekens et al., 2013#Liekens, I., Schaafsma, M., De Nocker, L., Broekx, S., Staes, J., Aertsens, J., & Brouwer, R. (2013). Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. Land use policy, 30(1), 549-559.#2009#2000#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Belgium#Forest#Existence, Recreation
Lindhjem et al., 2015#Lindhjem, H., Grimsrud, K., Navrud, S., & Kolle, S. O. (2015). The social benefits and costs of preserving forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 4(2), 202-222.#2007#2881#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Norway#Primary forest#Existence
Loomis et al., 1994#Loomis, J., & Gonzalescaban, A. (1994). Estimating the Value of Reducing Fire Hazards to Old-Growth Forests in the Pacific-Northwest-a Contingent Valuation Approach. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 4(4), 209-216.#1993#425#CV#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Primary forest#Existence
Lopes et al., 2021#Lopes, F. and Amaral, B. (2021). The value of forest recreation in Azorean public parks. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 59. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.238884#2018#323#TC#CS#Trip#Portugal#Forest#Recreation
Lozano et al., 2020#Lozano, J. E., Elofsson, K., Persson, J., & Kjellander, P. (2020). Valuation of large carnivores and regulated carnivore hunting. Journal of Forest Economics, 35(4), 337-373.#2016#314#HP#Marginal implicit price#Missing#Sweden#Forest#Recreation
Majumdar et al., 2011#Majumdar, S., Deng, J., Zhang, Y., & Pierskalla, C. (2011). Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 275-280.#2008#1219#CV#mean WTP#Trip#USA#Urban forest#Recreation
Martinez-Jauregui et al., 2015#Martinez-Jauregui, M., Herruzo, A. C., & Campos, P. (2015). What does hunting market price reflect? The role of species, landscape and management. Wildlife Research, 42(3), 280-289.#2009#225#HP#Price#Missing#Spain#Forest#Recreation
Marušć et al., 2005#Marušć, Z., Horak, S., & Navrud, S. (2005). The economic value of coastal forests for tourism: a comparative study of three valuation methods. Tourism (13327461), 53(2).#1999#320#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Croatia#Riparian forest#Recreation, Aesthetic
Meldrum et al., 2013#Meldrum, J. R., Champ, P. A., & Bond, C. A. (2013). Heterogeneous nonmarket benefits of managing white pine bluster rust in high-elevation pine forests. Journal of forest economics, 19(1), 61-77.#2010#522#CV#mean WTP#One-off#USA#Coniferous forest#Recreation
Melo-Guerrero et al., 2020#Melo-Guerrero, E., Hernández-Ortiz, J., Aguilar-Lopez, A., Rodríguez-Laguna, R., Martínez-Damián, M. Á., Valdivia-Alcalá, R., & Razo-Zarate, R. (2020). Choice experiments for the management of Los Mármoles National Park, Mexico. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales, 26(2).#2016#141#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#Mexico#Forest#Recreation
Mingie et al., 2019#Mingie, J. C., Poudyal, N. C., Bowker, J. M., Mengak, M. T., & Siry, J. P. (2019). Comparing the net benefit of forestland access for big-game hunting across landownership types in Georgia, USA. Forest Science, 65(2), 189-200.#2012#663#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Molina et al., 2007#"Molina, J. R., González-Cabán, A., & y Silva, F. R. (2019). Wildfires impact on the economic susceptibility of recreation activities: Application in a Mediterranean protected area. Journal of environmental management, 245, 454-463.
Chicago	"#2017#706#TC#CS#Trip#Spain#Broadleaved forest#Recreation
Moore et al., 2011#Moore, C. C., Holmes, T. P., & Bell, K. P. (2011). An attribute-based approach to contingent valuation of forest protection programs. Journal of Forest Economics, 17(1), 35-52.#2006#401#CV#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Forest#Recreation
Morton et al., 1995#Morton, K. M., Adamowicz, W. L., & Boxall, P. C. (1995). Economic effects of environmental quality change on recreational hunting in northwestern Saskatchewan: a contingent behaviour analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25(6), 912-920.#1991#1743#CV#mean WTP#Trip#Canada#Forest#Recreation
Mueller et al., 2018#Mueller, J. M., Springer, A. E., & Lima, R. E. (2018). Willingness to pay for forest restoration as a function of proximity and viewshed. Landscape and Urban Planning, 175, 23-33.#2012#90#CV#median WTP#Tax#USA#Forest#Aesthetic
Mäntymaa et al., 2018#Mäntymaa, E., Ovaskainen, V., Juutinen, A., & Tyrväinen, L. (2018). Integrating nature-based tourism and forestry in private lands under heterogeneous visitor preferences for forest attributes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(4), 724-746.#2011#1105#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Finland#Forest#Recreation
Müller et al., 2020#Müller, A., Olschewski, R., Unterberger, C., & Knoke, T. (2020). The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning–A choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111008.#2018#1250#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Switzerland#Forest#Recreation
Nielsen et al., 2007#Nielsen, A. B., Olsen, S. B., & Lundhede, T. (2007). An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landscape and urban planning, 80(1-2), 63-71.#2004#548#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Denmark#Mixed forest#Recreation
Notaro et al., 2019#Notaro, S., Grilli, G., & Paletto, A. (2019). The role of emotions on tourists’ willingness to pay for the Alpine landscape: A latent class approach. Landscape Research, 44(6), 743-756.#2013#90#CE#mean WTP#Trip#Italy#Mixed forest#Recreation
Otter et al., 2019#Otter, V., & Langenberg, J. (2020). Willingness to pay for environmental effects of agroforestry systems: a PLS-model of the contingent evaluation from German taxpayers’ perspective. Agroforestry Systems, 94(3), 811-829.#2017#1714#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Germany#Forest Plantation#Existence, Bequest
Ovaskainen et al., 2012#Ovaskainen, V., Neuvonen, M., & Pouta, E. (2012). Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: A Finnish case. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(4), 303-317.#2008#235#TC#CS#Trip#Finland#Forest#Recreation
Oviedo et al., 2016#Oviedo, J. L., Caparrós, A., Ruiz-Gauna, I., & Campos, P. (2016). Testing convergent validity in choice experiments: Application to public recreation in Spanish stone pine and cork oak forests. Journal of Forest Economics, 25, 130-148.#2008#604#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#Spain#Deciduous forest#Recreation
Oviedo et al., 2017#Oviedo, J. L., & Yoo, H. I. (2017). A latent class nested logit model for rank-ordered data with application to cork oak reforestation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(4), 1021-1051.#2002#450#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Deciduous forest#Recreation
Pak et al., 2006#Pak, M., Türker, M. F. (2006). Estimation of recreational use value of forest resources by using Individual Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods (Kayabaşi Forest Recreational Site Sample). Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(1): 1-5.#2000#130#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#Turkey#Forest#Recreation
Pang et al., 2017#Pang, A. (2017). Incorporating the effect of successfully bagging big game into recreational hunting: An examination of deer, moose and elk hunting. Journal of Forest Economics, 28, 12-17.#2006#21938#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Raviv et al., 2020#Raviv, O., Shamir, S. Z., Izhaki, I., Sagie, H., Negev, M., Mazor-Tregerman, M., ... & Lotan, A. (2020). The socioeconomic value of multiple ecosystem types at a biosphere reserve as a baseline for one holistic conservation plan. Ecosystem Services, 41, 101043.#2016#703#TC#CS#Trip#Israel#Forest#Recreation, Existence, Cultural heritage
Rekola et al., 2005#Rekola, M., & Pouta, E. (2005). Public preferences for uncertain regeneration cuttings: a contingent valuation experiment involving Finnish private forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 635-649.#1996#316#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Finland#Forest#Recreation
Remoundou et al., 2012#Remoundou, K., Kountouris, Y., & Koundouri, P. (2012). Is the value of an environmental public good sensitive to the providing institution?. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 381-395.#2009#403#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Greece#Forest#Existence, Recreation
Riccioli et al., 2019#Riccioli, F., Marone, E., Boncinelli, F., Tattoni, C., Rocchini, D., & Fratini, R. (2019). The recreational value of forests under different management systems. New Forests, 50(2), 345-360.#2016#248#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Italy#Deciduous forest#Recreation
Rolfe et al., 2015#Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2015). Multifunctional recreation and nouveau heritage values in plantation forests. Journal of Forest Economics, 21(3), 131-151.#2012#807#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Australia#Forest Plantation#Existence, Cultural heritage, Recreation, Cultural heritage
Rulleau et al., 2012#Rulleau, B., & Dachary-Bernard, J. (2012). Preferences, rational choices and economic valuation: Some empirical tests. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 198-206.#2006#170#CE#mean WTP#Trip#France#Forest#Recreation
Sander et al., 2015#Sander, H. A., & Zhao, C. (2015). Urban green and blue: who values what and where?. Land Use Policy, 42, 194-209.#2005#10017#HP#Price#House#USA#Forest#Recreation
Sardana et al., 2016#Sardana, K., Bergstrom, J. C., & Bowker, J. M. (2016). Valuing setting-based recreation for selected visitors to national forests in the southern United States. Journal of environmental management, 183, 972-979.#2000#6126#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Sardana et al., 2021#Sardana, K., Bergstrom, J. C., & Bowker, J. M. (2021). Effects of Ad-hoc Data Truncation and Homogeneous Preferences on Recreational Demand and Values: An Application to the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 53(1), 153-167.#2012#237#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Mixed forest#Recreation
Sheremet et al., 2017#Sheremet, O., Healey, J. R., Quine, C. P., & Hanley, N. (2017). Public preferences and willingness to pay for forest disease control in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 781-800.#2015#605#CE#median WTP#Tax#UK#Forest#Existence, Recreation
Shrestha et al., 2007#Shrestha, R. K., Stein, T. V., & Clark, J. (2007). Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida. Journal of environmental management, 85(4), 977-985.#2000#237#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Simões et al., 2013#Simões, P., Barata, E., & Cruz, L. (2013). Using count data and ordered models in national forest recreation demand analysis. Environmental management, 52(5), 1249-1261.#2010#276#TC#CS#Trip#Portugal#Forest#Recreation
Snyder et al., 2007#Snyder, S. A., Kilgore, M. A., Hudson, R., & Donnay, J. (2007). Determinants of forest land prices in Northern Minnesota: A hedonic pricing approach. Forest Science, 53(1), 25-36.#2001#387#HP#Price#House#USA#Forest#Recreation, Aesthetic
Soliño et al., 2017#Soliño, M., Farizo, B. A., & Campos, P. (2017). Behind the economics of hunting in Andalusian forests. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 63(3), 47.#2010#557#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Forest#Recreation
Soliño et al., 2020#Soliño, M., Alía, R., & Agúndez, D. (2020). Citizens' preferences for research programs on forest genetic resources: A case applied to Pinus pinaster Ait. in Spain. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102255.#2016#573#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Coniferous forest#Bequest, Scientific, Scientific
Starbuck et al., 2004#Starbuck, C. M., Alexander, S. J., Berrens, R. P., & Bohara, A. K. (2004). Valuing special forest products harvesting:: a two-step travel cost recreation demand analysis. Journal of Forest Economics, 10(1), 37-53.#1996#462#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Strazzera et al., 2003#Strazzera, E., Genius, M., Scarpa, R., & Hutchinson, G. (2003). The effect of protest votes on the estimates of WTP for use values of recreational sites. Environmental and resource economics, 25(4), 461-476.#1992#3013#CV#mean WTP#UseFee#UK#Forest#Recreation
Tavárez et al., 2019#"Tavárez, H., & Elbakidze, L. (2019). Valuing recreational enhancements in the San Patricio Urban Forest of Puerto Rico: A choice experiment approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 102004.
Chicago	"#2018#259#CE#mean WTP#One-off#Puerto Rico#Urban forest#Recreation
Tavárez et al., 2021#Tavárez, H. and Elbakidze, L., 2021. Urban forests valuation and environmental disposition: The case of Puerto Rico. Forest Policy and Economics, 131, p.102572.#2019#466#CV#mean WTP#Tax#Puerto Rico#Urban forest#Existence
Thiene et al., 2012#Thiene, M., Meyerhoff, J., & De Salvo, M. (2012). Scale and taste heterogeneity for forest biodiversity: Models of serial nonparticipation and their effects. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(4), 355-369.#2004#306#CE#mean WTP#One-off#Germany#Mixed forest#Existence
Treiman et al., 2006#Treiman, T., & Gartner, J. (2006). Are residents willing to pay for their community forests? Results of a contingent valuation survey in Missouri, USA. Urban Studies, 43(9), 1537-1547.#2014#6456#CV#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Urban forest#Recreation
Tu et al., 2016#Tu, G., Abildtrup, J., & Garcia, S. (2016). Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: An analysis of stated residential choices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 120-131.#2013#180#CE#mean WTP#UseFee#France#Urban forest#Recreation, Aesthetic
Varela et al., 2016#Varela, E., Jacobsen, J. B., & Mavsar, R. (2017). Social demand for multiple benefits provided by Aleppo pine forest management in Catalonia, Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 17(2), 539-550.#2011#297#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Spain#Coniferous forest#Recreation
Völker et al., 2016#Völker, M., & Lienhoop, N. (2016). Exploring group dynamics in deliberative choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 123, 57-67.#2014#125#CE#mean WTP#Tax#Germany#Forest#Aesthetic
Walsh et al., 1990#Walsh, R. G., Bjonback, R. D., Aiken, R. A., & Rosenthal, D. H. (1990). Estimating the public benefits of protecting forest quality. Journal of Environmental Management, 30(2), 175-189.#1983#198#CV#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Forest#Bequest, Existence, Recreation
Weber et al., 2009#Weber, M. A., & Stewart, S. (2009). Public values for river restoration options on the Middle Rio Grande. Restoration Ecology, 17(6), 762-771.#2005#302#CE#mean WTP#Tax#USA#Riparian forest#Existence, Bequest
Willis et al., 1998#Willis, K. G., & Garrod, G. D. (1998). Biodiversity values for alternative management regimes in remote UK coniferous forests: an iterative bidding polychotomous choice approach. Environmentalist, 18(3), 157-166.#1995#1097#CV#mean WTP#Tax#UK#Coniferous forest#Existence
Xu et al., 2022#Xu, L., Xu, W., Jiang, C., Dai, H., Sun, Q., Cheng, K., Lee, C.H., Zong, C. and Ma, J., 2022. Evaluating Communities’ Willingness to Participate in Ecosystem Conservation in Southeast Tibetan Nature Reserves, China. Land, 11(2), p.207.#2016#1130#CV#median WTP#Tax#China#Mixed forest#Existence
Yao et al., 2014#Yao, R. T., Scarpa, R., Turner, J. A., Barnard, T. D., Rose, J. M., Palma, J. H., & Harrison, D. R. (2014). Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecological Economics, 98, 90-101.#2009#209#CE#mean WTP#Tax#New Zealand#Forest Plantation#Existence, Bequest
Yao et al., 2019#Yao, R.T., Scarpa, R., Harrison, D.R. and Burns, R.J., 2019. Does the economic benefit of biodiversity enhancement exceed the cost of conservation in planted forests?. Ecosystem Services, 38, p.100954.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100954#2015#1356#CE#mean WTP#Tax#New Zealand#Forest Plantation#Existence, Bequest
Zawacki et al., 2000#Zawacki, W. T., Marsinko, A., & Bowker, J. M. (2000). A travel cost analysis of nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the United States. Forest science, 46(4), 496-506.#1991#22723#TC#CS#Trip#USA#Forest#Recreation
Zhang et al., 2018#Zhang, Y., & Zhou, X. (2018). The Evaluation of Forest Cultural Value Based on WTP: A Case Study in Diebu County of Gansu Province in China. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 6(3), 215-224.#2016#60#CV#mean WTP#Tax#China#Forest#Recreation
Zhi-Ying et al., 2020#Zhi-Ying, H. and Yeo-Chang, Y., 2020. Beijing resident’s preferences of ecosystem services of urban forests. Forests, 12(1), p.14.#2016#483#CE#mean WTP#Tax#China#Urban forest#Recreation, Cultural heritage, Sacred/religious
Zhi-Ying et al., 2021#Zhi-Ying, H., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2021). Beijing Resident’s Preferences of Ecosystem Services of Urban Forests. Forests, 12(1), 14.#2016#483#CE#mean WTP#Tax#China#Urban forest#Recreation, Sacred/religious
van Rensburg et al., 2002#van Rensburg, T. M., Mill, G. A., Common, M., & Lovett, J. (2002). Preferences and multiple use forest management. Ecological Economics, 43(2-3), 231-244.#1995#502#CV#mean WTP#Tax#UK#Mixed forest#Recreation
